Secret Share Share a secret

Comparing secret-sharing tools honestly

Secret Share onetimesecret Bitwarden Send PrivateBin Magic Wormhole
End-to-end encrypted Yes, always Only with an optional passphrase; otherwise server-side encryption Yes Yes Yes (PAKE)
Read-once / burn after reading Always Yes Optional (max access count) Optional Inherent (direct transfer)
Direct P2P transfer Yes, when both online No No No Yes (with relay fallback)
Works if recipient is offline Yes (encrypted drop) Yes Yes Yes No — both ends live
Zero-upload mode (nothing stored, even encrypted) Yes No No No Effectively yes
No account needed to send Yes Yes (basic use) Account required Yes Yes
Speakable code (no link required) Yes — 5 words Link (+optional passphrase) Link Link Yes — wormhole code
Files / large payloads No — text up to 10 KB Text-focused Yes (files need premium) Text/attachments (instance-dependent) Yes, any size
Interface Web Web Web/apps Web CLI (third-party GUIs exist)
Self-hostable No Yes Yes (server) Yes — that's the point Yes (relay)
Source Source-available (GitHub, not OSI-licensed) Open source Open source Open source Open source

When each tool is the right choice

The question that actually matters

"Is it end-to-end encrypted?" is the headline question, but the second one is just as important: what happens to the secret after it's read? Tools that default to read-once turn interception from a silent, permanent compromise into a visible, one-shot race. Whichever tool you pick from this table, prefer the configuration where the secret can be read exactly once and expires on its own.

Try the default-secure option — no account, encrypted in your browser, gone after one read.

Share a secret →